 |
| Map of the "Schengen area." The navy blue area shows the countries I was banned from this week, bringing the total up to 31 countries that I am now banned from. |
This is a professional English translation of the Dutch original:
Immigration and Naturalization Service
Ministry of Justice and Security
THE STATE SECRETARY FOR JUSTICE AND SECURITY
resolution
1. Subject
Name: Steven L. Anderson
Date of birth: 24 July 1981
Nationality: Citizen of America
Mr. Anderson is further referred to as 'person concerned'.
2. Intention
The intention is to declare the person concerned undesirable based on Section 67(1)(c) of the Aliens
Act (Vw).
The person concerned has already been identified in the Schengen Information System (SIS) on the
26th of April 2019.
3. Motivation for the intention
On the 25th of April 2019, the National Coordinator for Counterterrorism and Security (NCTV) issued
a letter to the Head of the IND, from which it can be concluded that the information available to the
NCTV about the person concerned justifies the concern that in the Dutch context his speeches may
cause tensions between different population groups and thus disrupt the public order and public
peace. The letter is included as attachment to this Decision.
It should be noted that the person concerned was already the subject of an alert in the SIS on the
26th of April 2019, and now it can be concluded that, on the basis of the content of the letter from
the NCTV, there are concrete indications that the person concerned constitutes a threat to public
order. Reference is made to section A2/12r of the Aliens Act Implementation Guidelines (Vc). It is
also considered that, on the basis of this alert, a third country national who is not subject to a visa
requirement, such as the person concerned, and who poses a threat to public order, national security
or public health, will not be allowed entry to the Netherlands.
The person concerned resides in the United States, or at least outside the territory of the European
Union. The person concerned therefore falls within the scope of Article 67 of the Aliens Act. Pursuant
to Article 67(1)(c)(v), a foreign national may be declared undesirable if he poses a threat to public
order or national security and has no lawful residence as referred to in Article 8(a) to (e) or (l)(vw).
In this case, it turned out that the National Coordinator for Counterterrorism and Security (NCTV)
concluded the following with regard to the person concerned in a letter dated 25 April 2019.
" Mr. Steven Anderson is an influential speaker/preacher who expresses hostility towards
homosexuals and actively promotes intolerance.
On the basis of research, I characterize speaker Steven Anderson as follows:
a. Anderson's expressions are often made in a theological discussion and are in the context of
his literal interpretation of the Bible. He's a fundamentalist Christian.
b. Anderson's sermons and statements are explicitly and fiercely against homosexuals and may
incite hatred.
c. Anderson does not call for violence against homosexuals, but applauds it when they die. He
thinks we/ the government should execute homosexuals.
d. Anderson is not openly anti-Semitic, but denies the Holocaust.
It can be noted that the information available to the NCTV about this speaker justifies the concern
that in the Dutch context his lectures may cause tensions between population groups of different
persuasions and thus disturb public order and public peace.
Incitement to hatred is punishable on the basis of Article 137d of the Penal Code and although the
assessment of punishability will always depend on the individual merits of the case, it follows from
the case law of the Supreme Court 2 that this may include statements that incite hatred or violence
or discrimination, but also statements that encourage intolerance.
The statements made by the person concerned, including cheering on the deaths of homosexuals
and the need for the government to execute homosexuals, are, by their very nature, intolerant.
According to the letter from the NCIV, the person concerned is actively promoting intolerance.
The statements made by the person concerned also imply that he is coming to the Netherlands for
"preaching and soul winning events "3 . It can be deduced from this that the person in question also
intends to influence others with his intolerant views.
In the light of the above, it is concluded that the person concerned is a real and imminent threat to
public order and that the presence of the person concerned in the country constitutes a present, real
and sufficiently serious threat affecting one of the fundamental interests of society. Incitement to
hatred of homosexuals affects a fundamental principle of society.
The intention to come to Amsterdam on the 23rd of May 2019, and by actively spreading his
message and the intention to gain support for his ideas within the Netherlands, also constitutes a
genuine and imminent threat to the public order. I also include the knowledge that, notwithstanding
the efforts of the Dutch government in that respect, violence against persons of a sexual orientation
other than heterosexual is not inconceivable in the Netherlands. Against this background, the risk
cannot be accepted that the presence and public action of the person concerned will directly lead to
an incorrect perception on the part of some and may contribute to the willingness of those persons
to commit (serious) violent crimes against the group referred to here. In view of the far-reaching nature of the statements made by the person concerned, this also constitutes a sufficiently serious
threat.
With this in consideration, it is concluded that there is a genuine, imminent and sufficiently serious
threat to one of the fundamental principles of society.
It is therefore considered that in this case the interests of public order and public security to be
protected, should prevail over the interests of the person concerned, that are served by a
(temporary) stay in the Netherlands. It is considered that, in view of the conclusion in the NCTV's
letter, in this case the interest of protecting public order must prevail over the freedom of the person
concerned to express his or her freedom of expression and religion.
In view of this, the intention is to declare the person concerned an undesirable foreign national on
the basis of Article 67(1)(c) of the Aliens Act Implementation Guidelines (VW).
In addition, the following is being considered.
The information at my disposal does not indicate that the decision declaring the person concerned
undesirable to be in breach of his private or family life or family life as referred to in Article 8 of the
European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR). Nor has there been any evidence of any particular
facts or circumstances on the basis of which an undesirability should not be pronounced.
As noted earlier, there is also reason, apart from the pronouncement of undesirability on the basis of
section A2/12 of the Aliens Act implementation guidelines, to report the person concerned to the SIS
for a period of two years, because there are concrete indications that the person concerned poses a
threat to public order. This alert shall have immediate effect. The person concerned may request that
it be revoked or may object to it.
The pronouncement of undesirability will remain in force until it is lifted. Pursuant to Section 68 of
the Aliens Act, the pronouncement of undesirability can only be lifted on request and subject to
certain conditions. Article 6.6, paragraphs 2 and 3, of the Aliens Decree (Vb) does not provide for a
period after which the pronouncement of undesirability in a situation such as this one is in any case
lifted.
4. Submission of Opinion
Pursuant to Articles 4:7 and 4:8 of the General Administrative Law Act, the person concerned may
express his views on the intention to declare him as an undesirable decision (in writing) and in doing
so may present facts and circumstances which, in his opinion, should be taken into account in the
decision-making process.
The party concerned will be given the opportunity to express his views on the intention in writing
within two weeks of the date of this intention and/or following the day of the announcement in the
Netherlands Government Gazette, i.e. ending on the 15th of May 2019. This opinion must be sent by
the person concerned, his (special) agent or a lawyer, if he declares that he is specifically authorised,
to the fax and P.O. Box mentioned on the first page of this intention, with reference to V-number:
2872359350 and/or to the e-mail address mentioned on the first page of this intention.
The Opinion was submitted in due time if it was delivered by post before the end of the two-week
period, provided that it was received no later than one week after the expiry of the deadline. The
absence of an opinion after that period does not preclude the adoption of a decision.
The Hague, 29 April 2019
on behalf of the Secretary of State for Security and Justice,
(This letter was produced in an automated process and is therefore not signed)
Senior employee
To the Director-General of the Immigration and Naturalization Service
Date 25 April 2019
Concerns information regarding Mr. Steven Anderson
The NCTV has received information indicating that Mr. Steven Anderson intends to speak during a
visit on the 23rd of May 2019 to Amsterdam. The person concerned himself has announced this in
various films on social media. In this context, I would like to inform you of the following.
Mr Steven Anderson is an influential speaker/preacher who expresses hostility towards homosexuals
and actively promotes intolerance.
On the basis of research, I characterize speaker Steven Anderson as follows:
a. Anderson's expressions are often made in a theological discussion and are in the context of
his literal interpretation of the Bible. He's a fundamentalist Christian.
b. Anderson's sermons and statements are explicitly and fiercely against homosexuals and may
incite hatred.
c. Anderson does not call for violence against homosexuals, but applauds it when they die. He
thinks we/ the government should execute homosexuals.
d. Anderson is not openly anti-Semitic, but denies the Holocaust.
It can be noted that the information available to the NCTV about this speaker justifies the concern
that in the Dutch context his lectures may cause tensions between population groups of different
persuasions and thus disturb public order and public peace.
on behalf of the Secretary of State for Security and Justice,
(signature)
H.P. Schreinemachers
Director of National Crisis Management
